Journal of Mental Health Research and Innovation
Editorial Tracking
Login Portal
Information for Authors
Welcome to the Researchpubx Author Portal
The Researchpubx Author Portal is a secure online platform designed to simplify every stage of the publishing journey from manuscript submission to editorial decisions and final publication. Authors can securely submit new manuscripts, monitor editorial progress, upload revised files, communicate with the editorial office, and access all submission records through a single dashboard.
Our editorial tracking system promotes transparency, efficiency, and timely communication while ensuring that every submission undergoes a fair and confidential peer-review process.
What Authors Can Do
- Submit new manuscripts to any Researchpubx journal
- Receive an instant manuscript reference number upon submission
- Monitor manuscript progress in real time
- Upload revised manuscripts and supplementary files
- View editorial decisions and reviewer comments
- Respond to revision requests through the portal
- Update personal profile and contact information
- Download submission acknowledgements and decision letters
- Receive automated email notifications at every editorial stage
- Recover login credentials securely whenever required
Manuscript Tracking Stages
Your manuscript may progress through the following stages:
Your manuscript has been successfully submitted and is awaiting administrative verification.
The editorial office evaluates manuscript completeness, journal scope, formatting, ethical compliance, plagiarism screening, and supporting documentation.
A qualified editor is assigned according to the manuscript's subject area and expertise.
Independent reviewers are invited based on their scientific expertise.
Expert reviewers evaluates the manuscript for originality, scientific quality, methodology, ethical standards, and significance.
The handling editor carefully considers reviewer recommendations before preparing a decision.
If revisions are requested, authors should upload a revised manuscript along with a point-by-point response to reviewer comments.
The Editor-in-Chief or designated Academic Editor communicates the final publication decision.
Accepted manuscripts proceed through copyediting, proofreading, DOI assignment, production, and online publication.
Editorial Decision Categories
The manuscript satisfies all editorial and scientific requirements and proceeds to production.
Only small corrections or clarifications are required before acceptance.
Substantial improvements are required. The revised manuscript may undergo an additional round of peer review.
The manuscript demonstrates potential but requires extensive redevelopment before being considered as a new submission.
The manuscript does not meet the journal's scientific, ethical, or editorial standards for publication.
Author Responsibilities
Authors are expected to:
- Submit original and unpublished research
- Follow journal formatting requirements
- Comply with publication ethics
- Declare conflicts of interest
- Obtain ethical approvals where applicable
- Respond to revision requests within the specified timeline
- Ensure all co-authors approve the submitted version
Need Assistance?
If you experience any technical difficulties while using the Editorial Tracking System, please contact the Researchpubx Editorial Office. Our support team is available to assist with account access, submission issues, manuscript tracking, and technical queries.
Information for Editors
Welcome to the Researchpubx Editor Portal
The Researchpubx Editor Portal provides Editors with a centralized platform to manage manuscripts throughout the editorial process. The system facilitates efficient manuscript handling while maintaining confidentiality, integrity, fairness, and adherence to international publication ethics.
Editors can oversee submissions, assign reviewers, monitor peer review progress, evaluate reviewer reports, and communicate editorial decisions using a secure online environment.
Editor Dashboard Features
- Access assigned manuscripts
- Conduct initial editorial assessment
- Assign qualified reviewers
- Invite additional reviewers when necessary
- Monitor review progress
- Evaluate reviewer recommendations
- Request author revisions
- Submit editorial recommendations
- Record editorial decisions
- Maintain confidential communications
- Access manuscript history and audit records
- Update editor profile and expertise areas
Editorial Responsibilities
Editors are responsible for:
- Evaluating manuscript suitability
- Selecting qualified independent reviewers
- Ensuring unbiased and confidential peer review
- Managing reviewer performance and timelines
- Assessing scientific validity and originality
- Detecting ethical concerns when identified
- Making objective editorial recommendations
- Maintaining confidentiality throughout the editorial process
Editorial Workflow
Assess scope, originality, completeness, ethical compliance, and journal suitability.
Assign independent reviewers with relevant expertise while avoiding conflicts of interest.
Monitor review completion and maintain communication with reviewers when necessary.
Evaluate reviewer reports together with editorial assessment.
Review revised manuscripts and determine whether additional peer review is required.
Recommend acceptance, revision, or rejection to the Editor-in-Chief where applicable.
Editorial Decision Options
- Accept
- Minor Revision
- Major Revision
- Reject with Resubmission Invitation
- Reject
Each recommendation should be supported by objective editorial comments and reviewer evaluations.
Editorial Principles
Researchpubx editors are expected to uphold:
- Editorial independence
- Scientific integrity
- Confidentiality
- Fair and unbiased decision-making
- Ethical publishing standards
- Transparency throughout peer review
- Compliance with international publication ethics
Information for Reviewers
Welcome to the Researchpubx Reviewer Portal
The Researchpubx Reviewer Portal enables invited reviewers to conduct confidential, objective, and constructive peer review through a secure online platform. Reviewers play a vital role in maintaining the scientific quality, integrity, and credibility of published research.
The portal allows reviewers to accept or decline invitations, access assigned manuscripts, submit confidential comments, and provide detailed recommendations to editors.
Reviewer Dashboard Features
- Accept or decline review invitations
- Access assigned manuscripts securely
- Download manuscript files and supplementary materials
- Submit reviewer reports online
- Provide confidential comments to editors
- Provide comments for authors
- Recommend editorial decisions
- Update reviewer expertise and profile
- Track pending and completed reviews
- Receive automated reminder notifications
Reviewer Responsibilities
Reviewers should:
- Maintain strict confidentiality
- Conduct impartial and evidence-based evaluations
- Assess originality, methodology, data quality, interpretation, and significance
- Identify ethical concerns when applicable
- Detect possible plagiarism or duplicate publication
- Provide constructive recommendations
- Complete reviews within the requested timeframe
- Declare conflicts of interest immediately
Peer Review Workflow
You will receive an invitation to review a manuscript, including its abstract.
Accept or decline the review based on expertise, availability, and potential conflicts of interest.
Assess scientific quality, originality, methodology, data presentation, statistical analysis, conclusions, references, and ethical compliance.
Submit detailed comments separately for authors and editors, together with an overall recommendation.
Editors may request clarification or an additional review if needed.
Reviewer Recommendation Options
- Accept
- Minor Revision
- Major Revision
- Reject
- Unable to Review
The final publication decision remains the responsibility of the handling editor and Editor-in-Chief.
Reviewer Best Practices
Researchpubx encourages reviewers to:
- Provide objective and respectful feedback
- Support recommendations with scientific reasoning
- Focus on improving manuscript quality
- Maintain confidentiality throughout the review process
- Submit reviews promptly
- Adhere to internationally accepted peer-review ethics and publication standards